The controlled reaction

What is the reaction to this image?
It could be:

• Fear of rulers
• Truth of reality

These reactions are the basis of the idea behind controlled and determined reactions in relation to desired effects, thus the reaction is always one of these, the problem is the uncertainty of what it will be. Because in this case it is in fact both reactions depending on the previous reactions.

So it becomes more coded for reactions, then simple controlled reaction. Thus this is the study and magic of Reactions in people by people and perhaps how to control those reactions towards ends desired.

However, remember that this is a mindless process, that you too are controlled by the reactions of people and that the brain in the vat is unable to exit that state of control, if it so chooses to think it is in control of others and not themselves.

So this is the absurdists realms:

\

What we can do with reactions of people depends on how it is used in context, and it is good to study this because without precedent, it becomes obvious that human reaction can be unpredictable. Just look at the most recent election in america for an example of an unprecedented reaction, which caused a schism between either party.

This could be argued to be of relevance, but off topic.

The topic is predicting how someone will react, based on how you would react to it in other cases or in emulation of other people and how to then attain that reaction in externalisation. ( Which can be a difficult task because the chain of reactions may differe in its predetermined state )

For example, if we had a theory that a bomb would be dropped, it will create a minimum of these two reactions:

• Beleif 
• Disbeleif

And the response would vary, but these in turn create different alterations of the individual based on how they react to circumstances. Such that they beleive the reaction you caused or do not, then leads to other things, such as:

• Cowering in fear
• Loosing hope and braving
• Ceasing to care about the convention
• Politely asking if one is sane

These in turn effect you differently based on which you were trying to attain.

But none the less, these reactions are better suited for control when they reach a common understanding rather then explicit effect, because you can better control those who want that thing, then those who do not and sometimes their is reason for why they do not want, while they want to help you.

So then the way to controlling the reactions of people, is to find what reason they aren't following your command and make alteration to the reactions catalyst, until it functions as would be appropriate.

For example:

"I want candy"

"No"

"Why?"

"You just ate candy"

"True, can I have some later"

"Yes."

In this example, you wanted candy, but the other person forbid it, so you tried finding the reason and the reason was shown, so you went around the problem and acquired candy later. Such that you still controlled the circumstance towards your end.

The person was no longer against it later, only now, so the consequence was avoided and the thing still attained.

( It varies by case, but are highly predictable )

Mwahahaha!