Of old and new memories

The past rewritten

For this blog post I have decided to explore the first post I ever made on a blog and blend the concepts within it, with the more recent ideas I have had on this blog.

Because I honestly don't remember what I said before and whether it is the same as now ( it isn't I already checked ). Thus I will advance a pile of past incompletion on this blog as said and one place to start with that is in the basic philosophy that brought me here and the here that is not that same space.

https://discordedtieunited.blogspot.com/p/start-here.html

is the blog post I was reading, it is ancient news to me, but may be novel to me although I'll admit it takes on some form of grandiosity, which I no longer carry around.

Some context is needed to better understand what I was trying to describe in that previous post, this context is that I was at the end of a manic break of inspiration, which originated from 6 months prior and lasted for that length of time and little after it. It took about a year to end at least in the sense of paranoia.

But what I discovered during the break is what I wrote about, specifically at the beginning the concept that everyone was right. That their was no wrong in the world and that their was not a means to incorrect ideas, but that through those ideas, solutions could be attained.

This was the symbol of the blog, which represented the concept I was trying to explain at the time, that advanced much farther then I expected, or perhaps knew would transpire. So the symbol is this one:

And it represents some form of absorbance of ideas in reference to evil and what I defined as good at the  time, specifically the concept of ONE (red snake) versus  ALL (white snake) and the central operator of unity against the unwritten discord, which only unity was the key to solving that discord.

It didn't fully understand itself and did not have an adequate understanding of what it was talking about however.

The subject of the post itself was one of four concepts I still use and brought back on this blog under the term of magic, but then in that past it wasn't viewed as Magic, rather as different core opinions in interaction with that concept of that good and evil.

Because I didn't quite understand what I was talking about, seeing as it had only been a few months since I began to think in this manner, I didn't quite make sense even to myself now after the length of "adventure" that followed.

The post divides itself into 4 parts:

1. Art ( Madness )
2. Science ( Wisdom )
3. Fear
4. Faith

and represents these concepts in relationship to that evil I was attempting to both describe and defeat, while being in my current view both a hypocrite and not at once.

So this is commentary on that first post, because I cannot disagree with what it said, but can say that their are better alternatives to what I had said, which would not bring about discomfort, because the concept of that post seems to be defined in simple detail as:

Their are solutions to problems we see, we don't know everything and this can lead to evils, those evils that are bad can be braved to solve them and opinions are the cause because people do not agree with each other.

But I go about it in a very disorganized way. Seeing as I should have probably said it in this order:

Their are problems with peoples opinions and denial, which lead to evils we must brave instead of ignore, because we don't know all of science and this can be dangerous, but know their is such thing as solutions.

Like, I literally wrote the essay backwards. So for the sake of this post, I will attempt a second writing of what I was trying to convey, with less grandiosity and with more detail and sense.

But before we begin, let's bring up the evil I was concerned with so horrifyingly:

The Hzulthug, Athagec and then Malum ( not the people in the drawing, the idea behind it )

Their are actually four beings relating to this concept, but the fourth is distant and not really relevant to the original blog post as much, so we will describe the first three in detail to better understand what they represented at the time:

The basic concept behind these things is polarity or distinguished views in relationship ( especially hate ) of those different views.

The first concept, the Hzulthug, represents the warring factions of those different views and seeks to divide the groups into different patterns of good or evil, such that the end of that battle is to end the evil of another.

The second concept, the Athagec, represents  the attempt  to spread that one view ( often called the good view ) across the entire world, such that the history of it can advance and that the world can be saved from that evil of another.

The last concept is the Malum, which represents the battle and disagreement itself, where the two opponent concepts ( good and the accused evil ) do the same thing ( are good and accuse of evil ) and that this is the cause of war and suffering.

The fourth is just nature, but that is a different one that has it's own circumstances outside the topic of this blog post, it is called the Chrysalis.

The faith

The three concepts here are what I was trying to discuss within the last part of the original blog post. The problem of different views hating each other for being unlike or counter to the definition of the other view and in turn that contradiction between them.

Remember that I am approaching this topic from the view that everyone is right, even when their is wrong in our knowledge, so the idea is that the view that you are the only good and the rest evil, is the interpreted evil of the blog. Thus it takes to defeat that evil, ( the ignorance of your own and the blame of another ).

But ironically this solves not anything, because I called myself good while blaming evil. This is the ironic downfall of the blog, because it does what it seeked to end.  Because it seeks to end the other which is thinking your self good, while another is evil by thinking myself good and calling that first thing, evil. So I was not better then the opponent in the blog and in many respects, while I said the red serpent was stopped by the unity, the white serpent devouring the first, would end in the same fate as the first ( crashed into a wall ).

So, the problem of faith, or blind faith as I call it, is that it forbids the belief of others, while believing only the self, which the hypocrisy shows is problematic ironically.

And it would take me a long time to stop pointing fingers at the Hzulthug, the Athagec and the Malum as the evil of the world.

So this , the faith was the first thing I thought of when I thought of problems, because its disbelief and accusation in my mind was wrong. Even when I thought that everyone was infact right.

So I was being hypocritical on the blog. That is the first lesson of it.

The fear

The second concept, beyond the problem itself, was the reaction to the apparent solution, believing everyone, which would provide a means of truth and in turn conventional fear, or the terror that came with believing the concepts you didn't want to believe. Such that one had to brave fear, to gain power over it while believing everyone else.

It was my solution to the problem I had created, taking to believing the other led sometimes to terror in accordance with what someone else believed that you didn't want to believe, because it led to conflicts with whatever you wanted, but the concept I forgot to mention on the blog, was that you could never abandon yourselves belief in that fear of another's while believing them.

So I was left trying to make solutions with the opponent. While thinking everyone was right and thus no amount of convincing would provide a solution to the act of belief, that refrained from believing the thing it did not like to believe or even create.

What it also said was, no one actually fully agrees because their is something  different about what they ended up believing in the conversation anyways, because they never actually abandoned their previous beliefs. So this creates a suffering, in the disagreement that never ends.

That disagreement is the Hzulthug, because it constantly pursues its opponent to convince them but can never attain perfect accuracy of conviction, since each person interprets the circumstance of the discussion differently.

So I suggested we simply look at fear and make it our friend or even lover, such that we create the bond of difference between ourselves and the other, without the conviction of one or the other.

The science

This one was about the horrors of the unknowns of sciences, in relation to every opinion heard on the planet and included my own, such as the actual plot point found in the picture above of decrepit zombies, which is the material extension of the whole problem.

Essentially the concern at the time, was that the ignorance of reality because of a lack of hearing the other perspective would lead to the reality where certain things unprecedented would come about, such as the release of a portal to hell ( as described nowhere )

and that science should at least take consideration of religion while delving deeper into reality, because in general that opinion, which is created from the mind, like science before testing is a figment of that mind.

This implied that a thing could not be checked until it was accessible, but that certain conventions were inherently inaccessible except through the other concepts, which a view denied, because it didn't necessarily agree with anything said by their view.

Thus the science in this case began to view things from outwards perspectives of what others said and thus criticism became vital, because fear is consumed and used to further develop the nature of reality within science as something other then just one perspective of it.

Since, you can do magic, without knowing how it works, but science says it is a coincidence and the absorption of either reveals that the force of magic is explicitly coincidence, because coincidence permits both the uncertainty of where and the effect, which meant at least already in my view, that aspects of religion had scientific value on the crossroads of either.

It could thus be said, that magic as we knew it was real and science could learn from it to attain something more powerful in its knowledge, then the sole portion of object in reality and not only subject observing details of an object called reality, but rather both the object and the observer.

The art

This is idea of disbelief bought on by faith, the consumption of fear in relation to the stability of either you and another and the potent ability that came with peoples assumptions on an object, created some form of artistic creativity in me to create solutions out of problems of perspective, such that I viewed the duality of myself and someone else as something to be learned from and then ascended above.

For example, knowing that convincing people is wrong in my perspective here and taking to hearing the other within the context ( convincing people ) was a difficult task, because I didn't want to loose my opinion, while this other wanted me to view it as conviction, the two functioned together because I realized you could do either in correct contexts if the persons involved desired it.

Thus the convention of the art, was that you could actually help yourself and others, through the recognition of each other as separate parts of the puzzle to greater things and that the convention of believing them, for the sake of yourself and them actually aided in the resolution of the conflict. Such that the conflict was resolved by the difference between either personhood.

Thus the topic at least that I was trying to convey, or perhaps am now is that ideas create solutions in their co-existence not as the one thing of one person, but the all of it all. Still, the one thing was the other one that spoke against the all and the same practice can be done with this convention, that one view or world and all worlds and views can be made compatible.

Because of the eventual difference of either, where one thing cannot exist without all things and all things is still just one thing makes it clear that one thing, the idea of you is separate and true to the  all of someone else. Because all only includes the conventions you know and the one is always what you know or view things as.

But this implies a literal unchanging to the world and a change to it brought on by addition to that convention, that convention of addition shows what happens when the first concept is unlike the latter.

So the art created is a regress of pondering on the nature of neither and both one thing or anything add infinity.

but the only way to showcase that is to take the start of this concept and just bond it to the end of this one previous.

The new thing, bonded from the past and future:

Let's begin this part by listing the things we need in summary and we will use them from memory, without reference of the previous part:

The first list is what we will use from this blog:

• Emblemscontrol magic : The magic of building things from observation alone
• Faithwill knowledge: The knowledge acquired from that which we believe exists
• Absuprimitive unend: The infinite landscape that is never complete while completing
• Soundlight instruments: The utility of non-existence with matter to create things

The second list is a summary of that above:

• Faith: That problem of disbelief and our own beliefs disagreed and that hate.
• Fear: That absorption of the thing we disagree with in other and the acceptance.
• Science: That study of those disagreements within materialist observation.
• Art: That solution of those two things in disagreement towards stability.

Then we combine those new and old concepts in some manner to attain a greater concept, but we will also extend them back to each other, such that they hear thrice from it ( more on that later ).

Through this we receive:

• Disagreed magic : Magic that is built from not knowing the other's key
• Creative fear: The creation of new concepts from those ideas in each
• Infinite study: The study of the nature of reality in infinite space
• Artful non-existence: The creation of things that aren't yet arrived

Then we add these to each above, to create novelty in the subjects of either:

Thus we build the four following things:

Emblems magic of disagreement ( Sprays )

Knowledge of other's creativity ( Spelience )

Subjective science of learning ( Parsemy )

Soundlight painted absence ( Plurence )

However, this post is already quite long , so we will divide these topics into four more posts.

Thus in conclusion, going back to the past can sometimes attain ways of finding things that were once thought impossible, through what once was possible in that previous part of life.

So we attain a new point of learning with this concept and can explore novel things.